I tried to post on here before, and for some reason my post didn't appear. I stumbled on this site and was shocked at the negative posts. Disgrunted ex-employees perhaps? A client with an axe to grind, (without all the particulars being given to the people reading the posts)?

If these posters are indeed posting facts, then why would they not have addressed these so-called issues with authorities.

For many years I have worked with animals from rescue organizations. Not long ago I was seeking a second opinion on a kitten I was fostering, which was in obvious poor condition. Dr. Mitelman saw me, depsite the short notice, and me not being a regular client.

He was able to give me a diagnosis and much needed advice on how to help this little kitten thrive. He took the time, did a thorough examination, patiently answered all my questions and provided me with printed information regarding the kitten's disorder. His interest and concern was genuine.

I have used many vets in the past due to my involvement with rescue groups (most groups use their own vets), as well as my own vet. I have also worked in a vet clinic.
I am well aware of the expenses of vet visits and treatments. I found this clinic on a par, and perhaps less expensive, with costs at other clinics. What was different than many of the clinics I have used, was the quality of care and the compassion.

The ones slandering the good name of the clinc and the veterinarians would be wise to heed this quote:

"Slander is the revenge of a coward, and dissimulation of his defense"
Author: Samuel Johnson